California homeschooling, in Re Rachel L.

I've posted about this elsewhere, but (at the moment) I don't think there can be too many blog entries about homeschooling parents not panicking about the judicial decision, in Re Rachel L because other bloggers are virally spreading the word that the sky is falling.

Facts about the decision and the response to it:

• The judge was considering the at-home teaching of children who are enrolled in a private Californian ISP (independent study program), and the law requires that the teachers in the school be credentialed.  The children were at home with their mother, who does not hold a teaching certificate.  The decision appears to be about the school using the mother as a tutor.
• Many California homeschoolers use the R-4 method of establishing their homes as private schools.  California law does not require private schools that are not independent study programs to have credentialed teachers.  (or at least that's my understanding of the situation)
• Homeschoolers are not to panic because of the decision.  The California homeschool groups have engaged lawyers who will be handling the case.

Appellate Court Case, Please Remain Calm, HomeSchool Association of California

HSC is being represented by counsel in this issue, and we will consult with them about our options and about the best strategy for limiting the impact of this decision.  It is not appropriate for us to state what that strategy is, but there are actions we can take that could significantly minimize any bad results.  HSC understands that its mission is to support the right of all parents to teach their children at home, and we will continue to work toward that end.  We will keep you informed here and through the e-list.

At the present time, it is recommended that California homeschoolers not change anything they are doing, just remain informed, support the groups who are handling this, and don't panic. When and if the time comes that public support needs to be rallied, we'll let you know.  We specifically request that no one contact any members of the legislature to suggest that a legislative solution be found.  It is quite possible that we can reach a result that limits the impact of this case and makes legislation unnecessary.

Comments

[Matthew B. Tozer Esq.]

I prepared an article that discusses the controversial and adverse home school ruling by the California Appellate Court in the case of In Re Rachael L. and explains practical and legal ways that the ruling may be overcome and/or avoided. Hopefully, it will be an encouragement to homeschooling parents.

http://www.christian-attorney.net/homeschool_law_california_in_re_rachel_l.html

[Matthew B. Tozer Esq.]

I prepared an article that discusses the controversial and adverse home school ruling by the California Appellate Court in the case of In Re Rachael L. and explains practical and legal ways that the ruling may be overcome and/or avoided. Hopefully, it will be an encouragement to homeschooling parents.

http://www.christian-attorney.net/homeschool_law_california_in_re_rachel_l.html